ČESKÁ UROLOGIE / CZECH UROLOGY – 2 / 2021

103 PŘEHLEDOVÝ ČLÁNEK Ces Urol 2021; 25(1): 94–105 11. Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17(1): 31 12. Tu X, Liu Z, Chang T, et al. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17(5): e860–870 13. Rai BP, Mayerhofer C, Somani BK, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy‑ -A Systematic Review Eur Urol Oncol 2021 Jan 18 14. Bruyère F, d’Arcier BF, Boutin J-M, Haillot O. Is urine culture routinely necessary before prostate biopsy? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010; 13(3): 260–262 15. Baba K, Sekine Y, Miyazawa Y, et al. Assessment of antimicrobiral prophylaxis in transperineal prostate biopsy: A single-center retrospective study of 485 cases J Infect Chemother Off J Jpn Soc Chemother 2018; 24(8): 637–640 16. Iremashvili VV, Chepurov AK, Kobaladze KM, Gamidov SI. Periprostatic Local Anesthesia With Pudendal Block for Transperineal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Trial Urology 2010; 75(5): 1023–1027 17. Marra G, Zhuang J, Marquis A, et al. Pain in Men Undergoing Transperineal Free-Hand Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsies under Local Anesthesia: Outcomes and Predictors from a Multicenter Study of 1,008 Patients J Urol 2020; 204(6): 1209–1215 18. Vyas L, Acher P, Kinsella J, et al. Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases BJU Int 2014; 114(1): 32–37 19. Thurtle D, Starling L, Leonard K, et al. Improving the safety and tolerability of local anaesthetic outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies: A pilot study of the CAMbridge PROstate Biopsy (CAMPROBE) method J Clin Urol 2018; 11: 205141581876268 20. Babaei Jandaghi A, Habibzadeh H, Falahatkar S, Heidarzadeh A, Pourghorban R. Transperineal Prostate Core Needle Biopsy: A Comparison of Coaxial Versus Noncoaxial Method in a Randomised Trial Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39(12): 1736–1742 21. Lopez JF, Campbell A, Omer A, et al. Local Anaesthetic Transperineal Prostate (LATP) biopsy using a probe-mounted transperineal access system: a multi-centre prospective outcome analysis BJU Int 2021 Jan 15 22. Leyh-Bannurah S-R, Kachanov M, Beyersdorff D, et al. Minimum Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ul‑ trasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Cores Needed for Prostate Cancer Detection: Multivariable Retrospective, Lesion Based Analyses of Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy J Urol 2020; 203(2): 299–303 23. Song G, Ruan M, Wang H, et al. HowMany Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy? J Urol 2020; 204(6): 1202–1208 24. Bass EJ, Donaldson IA, Freeman A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted transperineal prostate biopsy: a local anaesthetic approach Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 20(3): 311–317 25. Marra G, Marquis A, Tappero S, et al. Transperineal Free-hand mpMRI Fusion-targeted Biopsies Under Local Anesthesia: Technique and Feasibility From a Single-center Prospective Study Urology 2020; 140: 122–31 26. Ryšánková K, Hanzlíková P, Vrtková A, et al. Transperineálně prováděné fúzní US/MRI navigované biopsie prostaty 2021; Jan 22 [cited 2021 Feb 25]; Available from: http://czechurol cz/doi/10 nnnn/cur 2021001html 27. He B-M, Chen R, Shi Z-K, et al. Trans-Perineal Template-Guided Mapping Biopsy vs Freehand Trans‑ -Perineal Biopsy in Chinese Patients With PSA <20ng/ml: Similar Cancer Detection Rate but Different Lesion Detection Rate Front Oncol 2019; 9: 758