27 Ces Urol 2022; 26(1): 13–28 PŘEHLEDOVÉ ČLÁNKY 83. Hutterer GC, Patard J‑J, Colombel M, et al. Cytoreductive nephron‑sparing surgery does not appear to undermine disease‑specific survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2007; 110(11): 2428–2433. doi:10.1002/cncr.23054. 84. Krambeck AE, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, et al. The Role of Nephron Sparing Surgery for Metastatic (pM1) Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Urol. 2006; 176(5): 1990–1995. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006. 07. 015. 85. Flanigan RC, Mickisch G, Sylvester R, Tangen C, Van Poppel H, Crawford ED. Cytoreductive Ne‑ phrectomy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cancer: A Combined Analysis. J Urol. 2004; 171(3): 1071–1076. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000110610.61545.ae. 86. Chen J, He Q, LiuW, Li Y, ZhuangW. The Effect of Cytoreductive Partial Nephrectomy in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;Volume 15: 431–439. doi:10.2147/CIA.S243902. 87. Zlatev DV, Ozambela M, Salari K, et al. Trends and morbidity for minimally invasive versus open cytoreductive nephrectomy in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(6_suppl): 632–632. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018. 36. 6_suppl.632. 88. Rabets JC, Kaouk J, Fergany A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open cytoreductive nephrectomy for me‑ tastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2004; 64(5): 930–934. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004. 06. 052. 89. Eisenberg MS, Meng MV, Master VA, et al. Laparoscopic versus Open Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Advanced Renal‑Cell Carcinoma. J Endourol. 2006; 20(7): 504–508. doi:10.1089/end.2006. 20. 504. 90. Ganeshappa A, Sundaram C, Lerner MA, Gardner TA. Role of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cy‑ toreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal‑Cell Carcinoma: Does Size Matter? J Endourol. 2010; 24(8): 1289–1292. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0401. 91. Matin SF, Madsen LT, Wood CG. Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Urology. 2006; 68(3): 528–532. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006. 03. 076. 92. Margulis V, Matin SF, Tannir N, et al. Surgical Morbidity Associated With Administration of Targeted Molecular Therapies Before Cytoreductive Nephrectomy or Resection of Locally Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Urol. 2008; 180(1): 94–98. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008. 03. 047. 93. Jackson BL, Fowler S, Williams ST. Perioperative outcomes of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the UK in 2012. BJU Int. 2015; 116(6): 905–910. doi:10.1111/bju.12890. 94. Nunez Bragayrac L, Hoffmeyer J, Abbotoy D, et al. Minimally invasive cytoreductive nephrectomy: a multi‑institutional experience. World J Urol. 2016; 34(12): 1651–1656. doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1827-1. 95. Zhao K, Kim E, Vetter J, et al. Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy is associated with significantly improved survival compared with open cytoreductive nephrectomy or targeted therapy alone. Mol Clin Oncol. 2020; 13(6): 1–1. doi:10.3892/mco.2020.2141. 96. Abel EJ, Spiess PE, Margulis V, et al. Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumor Thrombus. J Urol. 2017; 198(2): 281–288. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017. 03. 011. 97. Miyake H, Sugiyama T, Aki R, et al. Oncological outcomes after cytoreductive nephrectomy for pati‑ ents with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena caval tumor thrombus. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018; 23(3): 553–558. doi:10.1007/s10147-017-1232-9. 98. Kwon T, Lee J‑L, You D, et al. Impact of surgery on the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with IVC thrombus received TKI therapy. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 110(2): 145–150. doi:10.1002/jso.23612. 99. Kroeger N, Pantuck AJ, Wells JC, et al. Characterizing the Impact of Lymph Node Metastases on the Survival Outcome for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Targeted Therapies. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(3): 506–515. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014. 11. 054. 100. Gershman B, Thompson RH, Moreira DM, et al. Lymph Node Dissection is Not Associated with Improved Survival among Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carci‑ noma: A Propensity Score Based Analysis. J Urol. 2017; 197(3 Part 1): 574–579. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016. 09. 074.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDA4Mjc=