192 Ces Urol 2022; 26(3): 186–192 ORIGINÁLNÍ PRÁCE 8. Tu X, Liu Z, Chang T, et al. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging‑Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17(5): e860–70 9. Rai BP, Mayerhofer C, Somani BK, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion‑guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion‑guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy – A Systematic Review Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4(6): 904–913 10. Xue J, Qin Z, Cai H, et al. Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for de‑ tection of prostate cancer: a meta‑analysis and trial sequential analysis Oncotarget 2017; 8(14): 23322–36 11. Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, et al. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a sys‑ tematic review and meta‑analysis Asian J Androl 2012; 14(2): 310–5 12. Guo LH, Wu R, Xu HX, et al. Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Trial Sci Rep 2015; 5(1): 16089 13. Marra G, Marquis A, Tappero S, et al. Transperineal Free‑hand mpMRI Fusion‑targeted Biopsies Under Local Anesthesia: Technique and Feasibility From a Single‑center Prospective Study Urology 2020; 140: 122–31 14. Meyer AR, MamawalaM, Winoker JS, et al. Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Improves the Detection of Clini‑ cally Significant Prostate Cancer amongMen on Active Surveillance J Urol 2020; 101097JU0000000000001523 15. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU‑EANM‑ESTRO‑ESUR‑SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent Eur Urol 2021; 79(2): 243–62 16. Bass EJ, Donaldson IA, Freeman A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted transperineal prostate biopsy: a local anaesthetic approach Prostate Cancer Prostatic, DiS 2017; 20(3): 311–317 17. Stejskal J, Hanáček V, Adamcová V, Zachoval R. Transperineální biopsie v diagnostice karcinomu prostaty Ces Urol 2021; 25(2): 94–105 18. Ryšánková K, Hanzlíková P, Vrtková A, Albínová T, Jendřejek M, Krhut J. Transperineálně prováděné fúzní US/MRI navigované biopsie prostaty Ces Urol 2021; 25(1): 27-34 19. Iremashvili VV, Chepurov AK, Kobaladze KM, Gamidov SI. Periprostatic Local Anesthesia With Pudendal Block for Transperineal Ultrasound‑guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Trial Urology 2010; 75(5): 1023–7 20. Ashley RA, Inman BA, Routh JC, et al. Preventing pain during office biopsy of the prostate: A single center, prospective, double‑blind, 3-arm, parallel group, randomized clinical trial Cancer 2007; 110(8): 1708–14 21. Addla SK, Adeyoju AB, Wemyss‑Holden GD, Neilson D. Local anaesthetic for transrectal ultrasound‑guided prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo‑controlled study Eur Urol 2003; 43(5): 441–3 22. Lopez JF, Campbell A, Omer A, et al. Local Anaesthetic Transperineal Prostate (LATP) biopsy using a probe‑mounted transperineal access system: A multi‑centre prospective outcome analysis BJU Int 2021; 128(3): 311–318 23. Catananti C, Gambassi G. Pain assessment in the elderly Surg Oncol 2010; 19(3): 140–8
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDA4Mjc=