163 Ces Urol 2023; 27(3): 159-163 PŘEHLEDOVÉ ČLÁNKY 2. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow‑up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008; 53: 160–168. 3. Varkarakis I, Kyriakakis Z, Delis A, et al. Long‑term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients. Urology. 2004; 64: 306–310. 4. Giulianelli R, Gentile B, Albanesi L, et al. Bipolar button transurethral enucleation of prostate in benign prostate hypertrophy treatment: a new surgical technique. Urology. 2015; 86: 407–413. 5. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. ISBN 978-94-92671-19-6. 6. Sivarajan G, Borofsky MS, Shah O, et al. The role of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the ma‑ nagement of large‑gland benign prostatic hypertrophy. Rev Urol. 2015; 17: 140–149. 7. Giulianelli R, Gentile BC, Mirabile G, et al. Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate (B‑TUEP) in benign prostate hypertrophy treatment: 3-year results. Urology. 2017; 107: 190–195. 8. Leonardo C, Lombardo R, Cindolo L, et al. What is the standard surgical approach to large volume BPE? Systematic review of existing randomized clinical trials. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019; 72: 22–29. 9. Giulianelli R, Gentile BC, Mirabile G, et al. Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs open prosta‑ tectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single centre 3-year comparison. Prostate Cancer Prosta‑ tic, DiS. 2019; 22: 110–116. 10. Hiraoka Y. A new method of prostatectomy, transurethral detachment and resection of benign pro‑ static hyperplasia. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi. 1983; 50(6): 896–898. 11. Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ. Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 1998; 33(1): 69–72. 12. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow‑up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008; 53(1): 160–166. 13. Neill MG, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, et al. Randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of prostate with plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 2006; 68(5): 1020–4. 14. Herrmann TR. Enucleation is enucleation is enucleation is enucleation. World J Urol. 2016; 34(10): 1353–1355. 15. Huang SW, Tsai CHY, Tseng CHS, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of new surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and network meta‑analysis. BMJ. 2019; 367: l5919. 16. Bhandarkar A, Patel D. Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate with Bipolar Plasma‑ kinetic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Randomized, Prospective Controlled Trial at Midterm Follow‑Up. J Endourol. 2022; 36(12): 1567–1574. 17. Samir M, Tawfick A, Mahmoud MA, et al. Two‑year Follow‑up in Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation and Resection of the Prostate in Comparison with Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Treatment of Large Prostates. Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology. 2019; 133: 192–198. 18. Bebi C, Turetti M, Lievore E, et al. Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate: Is it a size ‑independent endoscopic treatment option for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia? PLoS One. 2021; 16(6): e0253083. 19. Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Ventimiglia E, et al. Clinical Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Under Either Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy. Eur Urol Focus. 2020; 6(4): 720–728.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDA4Mjc=