Ces Urol 2024, 28(4):214-220 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2024032

Evaluation of the use of postoperative single-shot instillation chemotherapy after TURBT and reasons for not administering it

Roman Wasserbauer1, 2, Jakub Papirek1, Eva Hudecová1, Michal Fedorko1, 2
1 Urologická klinika, FN Brno
2 LF Masarykovy univerzity Brno

Wasserbauer R, Papirek J, Hudecová E, Fedorko M. Evaluation of the use of postoperative single-shot instillation chemotherapy after TURBT and reasons for not administering it. Aim of Study: Mitomycin C (MMC) instillation after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) reduces the risk of bladder cancer recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of single postoperative chemotherapy instillation after TURBT at our institution and the reasons for not administering it.

Patients and Methods: A retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients undergoing TURBT from 2016-2022. The total number of TURBTs and the total number of single-shot MMC instillations (SS-MMC) were evaluated. In particular, the group of patients with no obvious reason for not administering MMC was evaluated. Furthermore, the reasons for not administering MMC were evaluated.

Results: During the follow-up period, 735 TURBTs were performed in 538 men and 197 women (mean age 71 years, median 75 years) and 211 SS-MMCs (28.7%) were administered. After excluding patients with macroscopically evident residual tumor and palliative endoresection (n = 102) and patients with endoresection for reasons other than bladder cancer (n = 24), 609 TURBTs were performed when MMCs could be instillated. In this group, the representation of SS-MMC was 34.7%. The most common identified reason for not administering SS-MMC (n = 398) was hematuria (n = 83, 20.9%), bladder wall perforation (n = 66, 16.6%), and allergy (n = 4, 1%). In 245 patients (61.6%), the reason for not administering could not be traced. The reduction in the number of applications in 2019 and 2020 was due to the lack of availability of MMC and the COVID-19 epidemic.

Conclusion: Data on the actual practice of single instillation of chemotherapeutic agents after TURBT are scarce and suggest that its use is rather low. According to our data, it is administered in approximately one third of potentially suitable patients. Interpretation of the results is hampered by the lack of information on the reasons for not administering MMC in retrospective analysis of the documentation.

Keywords: Bladder cancer, postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, single shot mitomycin C, transurethral bladder resection.

Received: October 23, 2024; Revised: November 28, 2024; Accepted: December 4, 2024; Prepublished online: December 4, 2024; Published: December 18, 2024 


References

  1. Národní onkologický registr ÚZIS. Novotvary 2019-2021. 2024: 186-94.
  2. Babjuk M, Burger M, Compérat E, et al. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Working group on Oncological urology. Guidelines on Non -uscle -invasive bladder cancer. EAU, 2024.
  3. Brocks CP, Bütter H, Böhle A. Inhibition of tumor implantation by intravesical gemcitabine in a murine model of superficial bladder cancer. J Urol. 2005; 174(3): 1115-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Immediate Post-Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Intravesical Chemotherapy Prevents Non-Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrences: An Updated Meta-analysis on 2548 Patients and Quality-of-Evidence Review. Eur Urol. 2013; 64(3): 421-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Pešl M. Současné možnosti intravezikální chemoterapie. Urolog. praxi. 2022; 23(2): 76-9.
  6. Sylvester RJ, Oosterlinck W, Holmang S, et al. Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials Comparing a Single Immediate Instillation of Chemotherapy After Transurethral Resection with Transurethral Resection Alone in Patients with Stage pTa-pT1 Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Which Patients Benefit from the Instillation? Eur Urol. 2016; 69(2): 231-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Karsh L, Shore N, Soloway M, et al. Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Studies Evaluating Apaziquone (E09, QapzolaTM) Intravesical Instillation Post Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors for the Treatment of Low-risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer. 2018; 4(3): 293-301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Soloway MS, Masters S. Urothelial susceptibility to tumor cell implantation: influence of cauterization. Cancer. 1980; 46(5): 1158-63. Go to original source...
  9. Zhou Z, Zhao S, Lu Y, et al. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of continuous saline bladder irrigation compared with intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J Urol. 2019; 37(6): 1075-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Mahran A, Bukavina L, Mishra K, et al. Bladder irrigation after transurethral resection of superficial bladder cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Can J Urol. 2018; 25(6): 9579-84.
  11. Cookson MS, Chang SS, Oefelein MG, et al. National Practice Patterns for Immediate Postoperative Instillation of Chemotherapy in Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. J Urol. 2012; 187(5): 1571-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit