Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  28 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

268

Ces Urol 2015; 19(4): 256–269

PŘEHLEDOVÝ ČLÁNEK

24. Barry MJ, Gallagher PM, Skinner JS, et al.

Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open

retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men. J Clin Oncol

2012; 30(5): 513–518.

25. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al.

Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prosta‑

tectomy. Jama 2009; 302(14): 1557–1564.

26. Nguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al.

Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for

treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(12): 1517–1524.

27. Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, et al.

Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted

laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 54(4): 785–793.

28. Ramsay C, Pickard R, Robertson C, et al.

Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative

clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the

prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technol Assess. 2012; 16(41): 1–313.

29. Djavan B, Eckersberger E, Finkelstein J, et al.

Oncologic, functional, and cost analysis of open, lapa‑

roscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl 2010; 9(3): 371–378.

30. Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H, et al.

Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open

prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169(6): 2045–2048.

31. Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, et al.

Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the diffe‑

rential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach. J Urol 2013; 189(4): 1289–1294.

32. Bivalacqua TJ, Pierorazio PM, Su LM.

Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing

the surgical approach. Surg Oncol 2009; 18(3): 233–241.

33. Rosoff JS, Savage SJ, Prasad SM.

Salvage radical prostatectomy as management of locally recurrent

prostate cancer: outcomes and complications. W J Urol 2013; 31(6): 1347–1352.

34. Kimura M, Mouraviev V, Tsivian M, et al.

Current salvage methods for recurrent prostate cancer after

failure of primary radiotherapy. BJU Int 2010; 105(2): 191–201.

35. Chade DC, Eastham J, Graefen M, et al.

Cancer control and functional outcomes of salvage radical

prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;

61(5): 961–71.

36. Ismail M, Ahmed S, Kastner C, Davies J.

Salvage cryotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radia‑

tion failure: a prospective case series of the first 100 patients. BJU Int 2007; 100(4): 760–764.

37. Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Sumo G, et al.

Conventional versus hypofractionated highdose intensity-mo‑

dulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled

trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13(1): 43–54.

38. Peeters ST, Heemsbergen WD, Koper PC, et al.

Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate

cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with

78 Gy. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(13): 1990–1996.

39. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Smith LG, et al.

Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation

study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(23): 3904–3911.

40. Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al.

Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation

therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41(3): 491–500.

41. Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al.

Comparison of conventional-dose vs highdose conformal

radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. J Am

Med Assoc 2005; 294(10): 1233–1239.

42. Boehmer D, Maingon P, Poortmans P, et al.

Guidelines for primary radiotherapy of patients with

prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2006; 79(3): 259–69.

43. Poortmans P, et al.

Guidelines for target volume definition in post-operative radiotherapy for prostate

cancer, on behalf of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Radiother Oncol 2007; 84(2): 121–127.