Ces Urol 2003, 7(1):42-45 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2003010

Validity of urethral profilometry and new ways of urethral pressure measurement

F. Zá»ura1, R. Vrtal1, R. Fiala1, J. Rosenberg2, J. Křen2
1 LF UP v Olomouci
2 Západočeská univerzita Plzeň

The authors used the technology of multi-channel static perfusion urethral profilometry with the aim to compare pressure values in individual channels and to find the information value of one channel only to evaluate the validity of standard one-channel static profilometry.
They investigated a group of 25 patients with the method of four-channel static profilometry. The group consisted of patients with incontinence, BHP, urethral stricture, after RAPE and TUR. They proved, that the pressures in individual channels are so different, that the standard method of static profilometry is not reproducible and renders dianostic information of poor validity. The authors consider the use of four-channel profilometry a possible way to the improvement of validity and they prepare its implementation.

Keywords: urethral pressure, profilometry, UPP

Published: January 1, 2003 


References

  1. Brown M, Wickham JEA. Urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol 1969; 41:211-217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Vereecken RL. Physiological and pathological urehral pressure variations. Urol Int 1996;57:145-150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA et al. Prognostic values of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol 1981; 126: 205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Joseph DB. The effect of medium-fill and slow fill saline cystometry on detrussor pressure in infants and childern with myelodysplasia. J Urol 1992; 147: 444. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Lapides J, Ajemian EP, Steward BH et al. Further observations on the kinetics of the urethrovesical sfincter. J Urol 1960; 84:86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Gilmour RF, James DF, Toguri AG, Churchill BM. Analysis of the urethral pressure profile using a mechanical model. Invest Urol 1980; 18(1): 54-58.
  7. Haeusler G, Tempfer C, Heinzl H et al. Value of urethral pressure profilometry in the female incontinent patient:a prospective trial with an 8-channel urehral catether. Urology 1998; 52(6): 1113-1118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Messelink MD, Dabhoiwala NB,Vrij V et al. Multichannel urethral prossure profiles: repruductibility and three-dimensional representation. J Urol 1997; 11(3): 211-214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Zá»ura F, Rosenberg J, Křen J. Profilometrie uretry v experimentu, předáno do tisku.
  10. Křen J, Horák M, Zá»ura F, Rosenberg M. Mathematical model of the male urinary tract. Biomed Papers 2001; 145(2): 91-96. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, ľe informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit