Ces Urol 2014, 18(2):128-133 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2014016

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in Galdakao-modified supine position

Milan Král1, Barbora Látalová1, Michal Grepl1, František Hruška1, Filip Čtvrtlík2, Zbyněk Tüdös2, Pavel Rajmon1, Vladimír Študent1
1 Urologická klinika LF UP a FN, Olomouc
2 Radiologická klinika LF UP a FN, Olomouc

Aim:
To present our personal experience with Galdakao modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and in combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopic procedures.

Methods:
Between May 2013 to January 2014 we performed 20 percutaneous surgeries in modified supine position (percutaneous nephrostomy due to renal obstruction in 6 cases and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 14 cases). One case was performed using the combined intrarenal technique.

Results:
Average surgery time was 113 minutes and stone size was 310 mm2. In 8 cases there were multiple or staghorn stones. Average hospital stay following surgery was 4 days. There were no complications higher than Grade I according Clavien-Dindo classification. Auxiliary procedures were necessary in 4 cases. The three-months stone-free rate was 92.86%.

Conclusion:
According to our experience, modified supine position has several advantages over prone, both for the patient and surgical team, with an acceptable complication rate. Practical experience with this position is even more essential in combined endoscopic intrarenal procedures for stones.

Keywords: urolithiasis, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, modified supine position, ureteroscopy, stone-free rate

Received: March 3, 2014; Accepted: March 26, 2014; Published: March 1, 2014 


References

  1. Valdivia Uría JG, Valle Gerhold J, López López JA, et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol 1998; 160: 1975-1978. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int 2007; 100: 233-236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications, a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2): 205-213. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/21_Urolithiasis_LRV4.pdf
  5. Matlaga BR, Jansen JP, Meckley LM, Byrne TW, Lingeman JE. Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Urol 2012; 188(1): 130-137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Fillo J, Mardiak J, Maľa M, Szeiff Š, Červenakov L, Kopečný M. ESWL v liečbe urolitiázy: 2ročné skúsenosti s prístrojom Piezolith 3000. Ces Urol 2004; 8(3): 42-45.
  7. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Gupta A et. al. Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 2009; 181(3): 1163-1168. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Baard J, Kamphuis GM, Westendarp M, de la Rosette JJ. How well tolerated is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Curr Opin Urol 2014; 24(2): 184-188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, et al.; Croes PCNL Study Group. Supine Versus Prone Position During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. A report from Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol 2011; 25(10): 1619-1625. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Atkinson CJ, Turney BW, Noble JG, Reynard JMSM. Supine vs prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an anaesthetist's view. BJU Int 2011; 108: 306-308. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al.; CROES PCNL Study Group. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 2011; 25(1): 11-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Král M, Hradil D, Brázda B, et al. Řešení urolitiázy v transplantované ledvině perkutánní nefrolitotrypsí. Ces Urol 2012; 16(3): 180-183.





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit