Ces Urol 2026, 30(3):132-136 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2026015

Complications of transperineal prostate biopsy

Kristína Maguthová, Petr Nencka, Jindřich Šonský, Petr Klézl, Robert Grill
Urologická klinika 3. LF UK a FN Královské Vinohrady, Praha

Major statement: Transperineal biopsy is currently the preferred method for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Its lower incidence of infectious complications compared with the transrectal approach allows the procedure to be performed without routine antibiotic prophylaxis.

Summary
Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the incidence and spectrum of complications following transperineal prostate biopsies performed at our institution.

Methods: Between April 2022 and April 2025, a total of 386 transperineal prostate biopsies were performed at our institution using magnetic resonance imaging - ultrasound fusion guidance. We evaluated the incidence and spectrum of complications following the procedure in this patient cohort. Complications were recorded during the follow-up visit after prostate biopsy, which was routinely performed at our institution approximately 14 days after the procedure.

Results: In 321 cases, this was the first prostate biopsy, while 65 patients underwent repeated biopsy. A total of 366 biopsies were performed under local anesthesia and 20 under general anesthesia. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered in ten cases. The mean age of patients in the cohort was 66 years. The mean number of biopsy cores obtained was nine, and the mean prostatic specific antigen level was 9 ng/mL. Overall complications following transperineal prostate biopsy were recorded in 23 cases. Infectious complications requiring antibiotic treatment occurred in four cases. The most common complication was hematospermia (8×), followed by hematuria (5×), urinary tract infection (4×), and urinary retention (3×). Dysuria, hip pain, urethrorrhagia, and combined urinary retention with urinary tract infection were each observed in one case.

Conclusion: Transperineal prostate biopsy is associated with a minimal risk of infectious complications based on the evaluation of this cohort. According to our findings as well as the available literature, it is considered a safe method for the histological diagnosis of prostate cancer without the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Keywords: prostate cancer – complications of prostate biopsy – complications of transperineal prostate biopsy – transperineal prostate biopsy

Received: March 31, 2026; Revised: May 28, 2026; Accepted: June 4, 2026; Published: September 21, 2026 


References

  1. Coleman E, Radix AE, Bouman WP et al. Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, version 8. Int J Transgend Health 2022; 23(Suppl 1): S1-S259. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on prostate cancer: diagnostic evaluation. Arnhem (NL): EAU 2024. [online]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer/chapter/diagnostic-evaluation.
  3. European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer: classification and staging. Arnhem (NL): EAU 2024. [online]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer/chapter/classification-and-staging.
  4. Padhani AR, Barentsz J, Villeirs G et al. PI-RADS Steering Committee. The PI-RADS multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed biopsy pathway. Radiology 2019; 292(2): 464-474. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182946. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2018; 378(19): 1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Giannakodimos I, Kaltsas A, Moulavasilis N et al. Fusion MRI/ultrasound-guided transperineal biopsy: a game changer in prostate cancer diagnosis. J Clin Med 2025; 14(2): 453. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020453. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Stejskal J, Hanáček V, Adamcová V et al. Transperineální biopsie v diagnostice karcinomu prostaty. Ces Urol 2021; 25(2): 94-105. doi: 10.48095/cccu2021019. Go to original source...
  8. Grummet J, Pepdjonovic L, Huang S et al. Transperineal vs. transrectal biopsy in MRI targeting. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6(3): 368-375. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.58. Go to original source...
  9. Yang YJ, Yang EJ, Nguyen TT et al. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across settings with and without magnetic resonance imaging targeting. Eur Urol Open Sci 2025; 83: 205-218. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.008 Go to original source...
  10. Zattoni F, Rajwa P, Miszczyk M et al. Transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7(6): 1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Marra G, Bazzurro F, Dematteis A et al. Transperineal versus transrectal biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol Oncol 2026. In press. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.01.009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Xiang J, Yan H, Li J et al. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17(1): 31. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1573-0. Go to original source...
  13. Stangl FP, Day E, Vallée M et al. Infectious complications after transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2026; 12(2): 275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.005. Go to original source...
  14. Du J, Chen S, Terris MK et al. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates and complications between transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal and transrectal biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol 2025; 14(5): 1418-1428. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Chen KW, Poon BY, Tan N et al. Comparing outcomes of transperineal to transrectal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2022; 130(2): 186-192. doi: 10.1111/bju.15688. Go to original source...
  16. Hu JC, Assel M, Allaf ME et al. Transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: the PREVENT randomized trial. Eur Urol 2024; 86(1): 61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pradere B, Veeratterapillay R, Dimitropoulos K et al. Nonantibiotic strategies for the prevention of infectious complications following prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2021; 205(3): 653-663. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001399. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Mian BM, Siddiqui MM, Leapman MS et al. Transperineal vs transrectal prostate biopsy to reduce postinterventional complications: the ProBE-PC randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9(11): 1559-1565. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4079. Go to original source...
  19. Suartz CV, Santos LA, Matalani CF et al. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2026; 24(1): 102467. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102467. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Krsakova E, Čermák A, Fedorko M. Comparison of different regimens of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy. J Hosp Infect 2024; 145: 83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.12.012. Go to original source...
  21. Ryšánková K, Hanzlíková P, Vrtková A. Transperineálně prováděné fúzní US/MRI navigované biopsie prostaty. Ces Urol 2021; 25(1): 27-34. doi: 10.48095/cccu2021001. Go to original source...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit