Ces Urol X:X | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2026021

Comparison of the quality of CT excretory urography with and without administration of normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride solution)

Alexandra Kucserová1, 2 Gabriela Chudárková2 Kateřina Langová3 Lenka Bakaj Zbrožková1
1 Radiologická klinika LF UP a FN Olomouc
2 Radiodiagnostické oddělení, Nemocnice AGEL Valašské Meziříčí a.s.
3 Ústav lékařské biofyziky, LF UP v Olomouci
LF UP a FN Olomouc
I. P. Pavlova 6
77 9 00 Olomouc Lenka.Zbrozkova@fnol.cz

Major statement: Intravenous administration normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride solution) during CT excretory urography does not lead to a demonstrable improvement in filling or opacification of the upper urinary tract, and its routine use is not justified.SummaryAim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate whether intravenous administration of normal saline 0.9% sodium chloride solution (0.9% NaCl) during CT excretory urography improves filling and opacification of the upper urinary tract.

Material and methods: A cohort of patients referred for CT excretory urography between January and June 2025 was analysed. The standard CT protocol consisted of non-enhanced, arterial, parenchymal and excretory phases. During the examination, 90 mL of contrast agent and 50 mL of 0.9% NaCl were administered using a power injector. In half of the patients, an intravenous infusion of 120 mL of 0.9% NaCl was administered between parenchymal and excretory phase, while the remaining patients did not receive 0.9% NaCl infusion. The ureters were bilaterally divided into four segments, and contrast opacification of each segment was assessed on a four-point scale by two independent radiologists. In addition, renal pelvis density and intra-renal anteroposterior diameter were measured, as well as diameter and density of abdominal portion of the ureterall assessed bilaterally.

Results: Very good interobserver agreement was demonstrated for all quantitative and ordinal parameters (intraclass correlation coefficient – ICC > 0.9; Cohen\'s κ = 0.556–0.837). No statistically significant differences were found between patients with and without intravenous 0.9% NaCl administration for any of the evaluated parameters (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Intravenous 0.9% NaCl administration during CT excretory urography did not result in a statistically significant improvement in urinary tract filling or opacification compared with patients who did not receive 0.9% NaCl infusion.

Keywords: 0.9% NaCl – CT excretory urography – opacification – urinary tract

Received: June 26, 2026; Revised: August 6, 2026; Accepted: August 26, 2026; Prepublished online: November 3, 2026 


References

  1. Abdel-Gawad M, Ali-El-Dein B, Barry J et al. The ureter: a comprehensive review. 1st ed. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland 2023; 672. Go to original source...
  2. Weatherspoon K, Smolinski S, Rakita D et al. Intravenous vs oral hydration administration for optimal ureteral opacification in computed tomographic urography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42(12): 2890-2897. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1231-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Caoili EM, Inampudi P, Cohan RH et al. Optimization of multi-detector row CT urography: effect of compression, saline administration, and prolongation of acquisition delay. Radiology 2005; 235(1): 116-123. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2351031085. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Silverman SG, Akbar SA, Mortele KJ et al. Multi-detector row CT urography of normal urinary collecting system: furosemid versus saline adjunct to contrast medium. Radiology 2006; 240(3): 749-755. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2403050233. Go to original source...
  5. Sudakoff GS, Dunn DP, Hellman RS et al. Opacification of genitourinary collecting system during MDCT urography with enhanced CT digital radiography: nonsaline versus saline bolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186(1): 122-129. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1835. Go to original source...
  6. O'Connor OJ, Maher MM. CT urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195(5): W320-W324. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4198. Go to original source...
  7. Cellina M, Cè M, Rossini N et al. Computed tomography urography: state of the art and beyond. Tomography 2023; 9(3): 909-930. doi: 10.3390/tomography9030075. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Baron S, Courbebaisse M, Lepicard EM et al. Assessment of hydration status in a large population. Br J Nutr 2015; 113(1): 147-158. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514003213. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit