Ces Urol 2003, 7(4):6-10 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2003021

Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty

R. Kočvara1,2, J. Sedláček1, M.Vraný3, J. Dvořáček1,2, Z. Dítě1,2
1 Urologická klinika VFN a 1. LF UK, Praha, vedoucí J. Dvořáček
2 Subkatedra dětské urologie a katedra urologie IPVZ Praha, vedoucí R. Kočvara a J. Dvořáček
3 Chirurgické oddělení Nemocnice Jablonec nad Nisou, vedoucí M. Vraný

Aim of the study. To compare the treatment of stenosis of pyeloureteral junction (PUJ) by laparoscopic technique with open surgery and to draw attention to the problems associated with the implementation of this technique.

Patients and methods: We indicated 12 patients to laparoscopic (LP) or retroperitoneoscopic (RP) pyeloplasty because of stenosis of PUJ from March 2001 do May 2003. Except for one female patient (58 years), all patients were 12,5 to 19,3 years (mean 16,4 years) of age. We compared them to a group of 13 patients in the age of 9 to 26 years (mean 13,4 years), operated on by transmuscular lumbotomic incission in the years 2000-2001.

Results: LP surgery was performed in 7, RP in 5 patients, of which one was converted to open surgery and one finished by laparoscopy because of opening of the peritoneum. In 8 of 12 patients a bundle of abberant vessels was found over PUJ. In one female patient an obstructed ureteral stent had to be replaced after surgery. In comparison with open surgery, there is less need of analgesics (67 vs. 105 mg of piritramide) and a shorter postsurgical recovery, but the duration of the procedure is twice as long (150 vs. 310 minutes). An easier and faster procedure can be achieved when a right-handed surgeon performs LP procedure on the left side and RP procedure on the right side. There was no persistence of PUJ obstruction in any patient.

Conclusion: Pyeloplasty done by laparoscopic technique is a convenient alternative of the treatment of the PUJ stenosis, especially when the presence of aberant renal vessels is suspected. Apart from escaping lumbotomy it ensures higher quality of postoperative course and a faster recovery. The duration of the procedure can be decreased by a correct indication of LP or RP accesss.

Keywords: laparoscopy, retroperitoneoscopy, pyeloplasy, hydronefrosis

Published: September 1, 2003 


References

  1. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM et al. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995; 46: 791-795. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL. Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1977; 118: 162-165. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Utíkalová A. Taktika chirurgické léčby u pokročilých dětských hydronefróz. Rozhl Chir 1998; 77:: 517-522.
  4. Dvořáček J, Kočvara R, Kříž J. Mikrochirurgická rekonstrukce horních močových cest. Rozhl Chir 1988; 67:: 659-665.
  5. Karlin GS, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Endopyelotomy versus open pyeloplasty: comparison in 88 patients. J Urol 1988; 140: 476-478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Meretyk I, Meretyk S, Clayman RV. Endopyelotomy: comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques. J Urol 1992; 148: 775-778. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Motola JA, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: an 8-years follow-up. J Urol 1993; 149: 453-458. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Van Cangh PJ, Wilmart JF, Opsomer RJ, Abi-Aad A, Wese FX, Lorge F. Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: critical analysis of prognostic factors. J Urol 1994; 151: 934-937. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dis membered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795-1799. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kavoussi LR, Peters CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 150: 1993, 1891- 1894. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Puppo P, Perachino M, Riccotti G, Bozzo W, Pezzica C. Retroperitoneoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic obstruction. Eur Urol 1997; 31: 204-208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Altarac S, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvis junction obstruction. Urology 1996; 47 (3): 311-316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Moore RG, Averch TD, Schulam PG, Adams JD, Chen RN, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: expirience with the initial 30 cases. J Urol 1997; 157: 459-462. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: indications, technique and long-term outcome. Urol Clin N Am 1998; 25: 323-330. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Soulier M, Salomon L, Patard JJ, Mouly P, Manunta A, Antiphon P, Lobel B, Abbou CC, Plante P. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001; 166: 48-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kočvara R, Vraný M, Dvořáček J, Dítě Z, Sedláček J. Laparoskopická pyeloplastika. Čes Urol 2002; 6 (2): 78.
  17. Zerhau P, Tůma J, Kubátová J. Retroperitoneální laparoskopická nefrektomie a pyeloplastika. Čes Urol 2002; 6 (2): 78.
  18. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: Initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 453-458. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Parra RO, Perez MG, Boulier JA, Cummings JM. Comparison between standard flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease. J Urol 1995; 153: 1171-1174. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Kaouk JH, Kuang W, Gill IS. Laparoscopic dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty: a novel technique. J Urol 2002; 167: 229-231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Tan HL. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children using needlescopic instrumentation. Urol Clin North Amer 2001; 28: 43-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Rassweiler JJ, Seeman O, Frede T, Henkel TO, Alken P. Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. J Urol 1998; 160: 1265-1269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device. J Urol 1992; 148: 1137-1139. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Nagai A, Nasu Y, Hashimoto H, Tsugawa M, Yasui K, Kumon H. Retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2001; 165: 23-26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit