Ces Urol 2015, 19(3):194-200 | DOI: 10.48095/cccu2015035

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy - first experience

Michal Balík, Petr Hušek, Lukáš Holub, Josef Košina, Miloš Broďák
Urologická klinika FN a LF UK Hradec Králové

Balík M, Hušek P, Holub L, Košina J, Broďák M. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy - first experience.

Aims: The evaluation of our first experience with laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Methods: A cohort of 12 patients who underwent laparocopic radical cystectomy from April 2014 to June 2015 was assessed. The cohort comprised 11 men and one woman; the mean age was 64.5 (54-74) years. All patients received extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy and cystectomy via laparoscopic approach. The diversion of urine was created extracorporally, eleven ileal conduits and one continent neobladder.

Results: The median follow-up was 10 months. The mean time of surgery was 358 (279-420) minutes. The average blood loss was 266 (100-1000) ml and the mean length of hospital stay was 16.5 (12-30) days. No patient had infection in surgical wounds. One patient died 8 months after surgery from renal failure without subrenal obstruction. One patient with confirmed metastasis in one lymph node underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and palliative chemotherapy for local recurrence and died 9 months after surgery. The patient with continent neobladder developed stenosis in both ureteroileal and urethroileal anastomoses and undergo revision surgery. Nine remaining patients were without complications and in remission.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a minimally invasive and safe alternative to open procedure. We observed lower blood loss, no complication in surgical wounds and shorter convalescence.

Keywords: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy, extracorporeal ileal conduit, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Received: August 25, 2015; Accepted: September 22, 2015; Prepublished online: September 24, 2015; Published: October 7, 2015 


References

  1. Witjes JA, Compérat E, Cowan NC, et al. EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2014; 65: 778-792. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, et al. A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Pract. 2012; 66: 656-662. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Basillote JB, Abdelshehid C, Ahlering TE, Shanberg AM. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder: a comparison with the open approach. J Urol 2004; 172: 489-493. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Haber GP, Crouzet S, Gill IS. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a critical analysis. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 54-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Hora M, Eret V, Ürge T, et al. Role laparoskopie v urologii, Ces Urol 2011; 15: 93-100.
  6. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, et al. European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013; 64: 639-653. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Pagano F, Artibani W, Aragona F, et al. Vesica ileale Padovana (VIP): surgical technique, long-term functional evaluation, complications and management. Arch Esp Urol. 1997; 50: 785-793.
  8. Kouba E, Sands M, Lentz A, et al. A comparison of the Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2007; 178: 945-948. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Sánchez de Badajoz E, Gallego Perales JL, Reche Rosado A, et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit: case report. J Endourol. 1995; 9: 59-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Denewer A, Kotb S, Hussein O, El-Maadawy M. Laparoscopic assisted cystectomy and lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer: initial experience. World J Surg. 1999; 23: 608-611. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Gill IS, Fergany A, Klein EA, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 2 cases. Urology. 2000; 56: 26-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Rassweiler J. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Where are we really? Eur Urol 2008; 54: 19-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Challacombe BJ1, Bochner BH, Dasgupta P, et al. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications. Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 767-775. Go to PubMed...
  14. Chlosta P, Drewa T, Siekiera J, et al. Lymph node dissection during laparoscopic (LRC) and open (ORC) radical cystectomy due to muscle invasive bladder urothelial cancer (pT2-3, TCC). Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2011; 6: 127-131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Mmeje CO, Nunez-Nateras R, Nielsen ME, et al. Oncologic outcomes for lymph node-positive urothelial carcinoma patients treated with robot assisted radical cystectomy: with mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Urol Oncol. 2013; 31: 1621-1627. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Musch M, Janowski M, Steves A, et al. Comparison of early postoperative morbidity after robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: results of a prospective observational study. BJU Int. 2014; 113: 458-467. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Albisinni S, Oderda M, Fossion L, et al. The morbidity of laparoscopic radical cystectomy: analysis of postoperative complications in a multicenter cohort by the European Association of Urology (EAU)-Section of Uro-Technology. World J Urol. 2015 Jul 2. [Epub ahead of print]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Montes SF, Rodríguez IG, Ugarteburu RG, et al. Intraoperative laparoscopic complications for urological cancer procedures. World J Clin Cases. 2015; 16: 450-456. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Albisinni S, Rassweiler J, Abbou CC, et al. Long-term analysis of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in Europe: results from a multicentre study by the European Association of Urology (EAU) section of Uro-technology. BJU Int. 2015; 115: 937-945. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Sterrett S, Mammen T, Nazemi T, et al. Major urological oncological surgeries can be performed using minimally invasive robotic or laparoscopic methods with similar early perioperative outcomes compared to conventional open methods. World J Urol. 2007; 25: 193-198. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Challacombe BJ, Bochner BH, Dasgupta P, Gill I, et al. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications. Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 767-775. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Hemal AK, Kumar R, Seth A, Gupta NP. Complications of laparoscopic radical cystectomy during the initial experience. Int J Urol. 2004; 11: 483-488. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Fonseka T, Ahmed K, Froghi S, et al. Comparing robotic, laparoscopic and open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015; 87: 41-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Snow-Lisy DC, Campbell SC, Gill IS, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2014; 65: 193-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Khan MS, Elhage O, Challacombe B, et al. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013; 64: 219-224. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Yuh B, Wilson T, Bochner B, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015; 67: 402-222. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...





Web časopisu Česká urologie je určen pouze pro lékaře a odborníky
z oblasti medicíny nebo farmacie.



Beru na vědomí, že informace zveřejněné na těchto stránkách
nejsou určeny pro laickou veřejnost.



Odejít Vstoupit